10 years of bleaching rotten rice and replacing Yingluck!?



Thailand is 360 degrees

The next day Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Commerce Mr. Eating Poomdham Vechayachai Rice Show created an unexpected backlash. Originally, the goal was to show that old rice that had been stored for 10 years was still of good quality and edible, and the goal was to sell it and bring back some money. It indicates that at least in the past the rice pledging scheme did not cause any damage.

Of course, in the past, the rice pledge scheme took place during the government period. Mrs Yingluck Shinawatra has been the biggest scandal in the past. A former minister who caused 500 billion baht in damage. And high-level government officials should imprison many, including those in the private sector. Especially Mr. Boonchong Theriaprom, Former Trade Minister and Mr. The likes of Bam Sarabon, former deputy trade minister, while Ms Yingluck is guilty of negligence in causing the scandal. 5 years in jail until 2017 when he left the country

With such schemes, many damages are caused. Especially budget loss. Each year compensation must be budgeted and not yet paid in full. There is still some rice in the warehouse. This, over a period of ten years, inevitably deteriorates and causes the rice to rot.

To check the quality of rice in a warehouse, a team led by Mr. Poomtham Vechaichai conducted a “Cooking Rice Show” in Surin Province and a food show to show that the quality is still good, still edible, but the picture you can see is that the rice is yellow in color. Moth-infested rotting sack full of dust and should not be eaten by sight. Because there is a health risk based on fungi and chemicals that have to be smoked with pesticides continuously for many years

After trying to eat rice at a rice pledge program in Surin Province on May 6, Mr. Bhoomtam Vechaichai said: Don't pay attention to such details. Because every bag of rice is different. There is a lot of dust, a little dust. Whether it is 10 or 15 times a day it depends on one's feelings. This is not a problem. Don't switch from the topic to something else. What did he do today because he is in charge of rice related agencies the owner of the warehouse has requested to take whatever he wants. Rice has been stored here for 10 years and the warehouse is locked. Are you going to let this happen for the rest of your life? Or they come to inspect and manage whether it is rotten rice or good rice, deal with it. Let's close this matter. So he went to inspect and taste the rice. And we can say that the rice is not wilted.

People come out and say that rice kept for only 1-2 years will rot. Make sure the rice is rotten or not, it really depends on how it is stored. And we tried to make the media see that wherever you want to drill, drill. Above, the bad rice was able to drill through the core where it was mostly hidden, we drilled 15 floors, flew the drone and took pictures for your viewing pleasure. I don't want my imagination to guide reality because everything is transparent. Today we speak the truth and solve problems.

“Actually, I didn't have to do anything. I just keep publishing. It's not something that worries me. But because someone complained, we went and looked. Today we physically prove it. The preliminary evidence is that the rice grains were not broken, were they yellow? This is normal for rice over the years. The thing is, if you're going to grind the rice, it's normal to smell it for 14 days. It's useless. I've seen them all I think buyers should check again. Don't be too dramatic to sell it today.”

Mr. Bhoomtam added that the complainants should come together and think how to solve the problem. Eating today has nothing to do with reality. But he was the one who came to prove that 10-year-old rice has not changed and was told that it will rot after 1 year. No 5 year old sorghum sample shown. Whether rice is good or bad depends on how it is stored. However, the day they went to visit brought a surveyor. As per quality rice examiner business registration completed I went to inspect lots of rice. It is accepted to sell abroad, therefore, every process that has problems has been proven. If he says something is there, he will prove it to you. Don't keep talking. Then there is no way out.

“Let's talk to each other. Let's talk about the truth and everyone involved has seen it. And what problems do people see? Solve the problem, finish the legend, destroy it, get the benefits, bring 200-400 million baht, use the money to compensate the owner of the warehouse he owned. I think it is good for the country. Arguing why they kept it for 10 years and still it looks like normal rice when opened? Why did they sell it for 5 Baht that day, they say they can sell it for 15-18 Baht even today. Because I don't like drama with anyone. Bring truth to speak, bring problems to share, bring wisdom to solve problems,” said Mr. Bhoomtam.

Of course, when you understand the meaning of Mr. Poomtham Vechayachi's words, he summarizes the issue to ensure that the rice is “still of good quality” and can still be sold at no less than 200-400 million baht, and is trying. To prove this, in the past rice under the Rice Pledge scheme was sold at artificially cheap prices. Even if the rice is not wilted.

Politically speaking, many saw this as an attempt to “whitewash” the rice pledge scheme. And try to connect Mrs. Yingluck Shinawatra is considered as their “mistress”, which is still seen legally as the proceeds from the sale of rice. Somehow it will be used later to cover the debt and the important thing is when it is proved that the rice does not wither. Still good quality it could be a channel Yingluck Ms bring it up to reconsider the case.

As for the other aspect, Mr. Bhumdham Vechai's method of execution. How much benefit? Because when we consider the fact that although it is confirmed that “rice does not rot” and can be sold but it is old rice, it can be stored for ten years. It should deteriorate in quality. And the picture that came out made it clear that it should not be consumed. At the same time, despite attempts to “whitewash” Ms. Yingluck but it turned out to be bringing back stories of corruption from the rice pledge program that should be talked about. Let's dig deeper. Definitely considered worthless!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *