JPMorgan acquired First Republic after it was taken over by the California financial regulator

  • JPMorgan acquired all of the First Republic’s deposits and “a significant majority of the assets”. Its shares were up 2.6% in pre-market trading on the news.
  • It came after the California financial regulator acquired First Republic, leading to the third failure of a US bank since March.
  • First Republic unleashed a new wave of anxiety last month when it revealed that it had lost more deposits in the first quarter than originally feared.

A view of the First Republic Bank logo at the Park Avenue location in New York City on March 10, 2023.

David de Delgado | Reuters

California’s financial regulator took over First Republic Monday, leading to the third failure for a US bank since March, after a last-ditch effort to persuade rival lenders to keep the troubled bank afloat failed.

JPMorgan Chase acquired all First Republic deposits, including uninsured deposits, and “the vast majority of assets,” according to a statement. JPMorgan shares rose 2.6% in pre-market trading on the news.

California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation He said It took over the bank and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver. The FDIC has accepted JPMorgan’s bid for the bank’s assets.

“As part of the deal, the 84 First Republic Bank offices in eight states as branches of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, will reopen today during normal business hours,” FDIC said. he said in a statement.

“All depositors of First Republic Bank will become depositors of JPMorgan Chase, National Association, and will have full access to all of their deposits.”

JPMorgan Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon said its takeover reduces the costs of the Deposit Insurance Fund.

“Our government has called on us and others to step up, and we have done so,” he said in a statement. “This acquisition is of modest benefit to our company overall, it is accretive to shareholders, it helps to enhance our wealth strategy, and it is complementary to our existing franchise.”

Since the sudden collapse of the Silicon Valley bank in March, attention has focused on the First Republic as the weakest link in the US banking system. Like SVB, which caters to the tech startup community, First Republic has also been a niche lender of sorts in California. It focused on serving wealthy coastal Americans, enticing them with low-rate mortgages in return for leaving the cash in the bank.

But that model fell apart in the wake of SVB’s collapse, with First Republic customers withdrawing more than $100 billion in deposits, the bank revealed in its April 24 earnings report. Institutions with a high percentage of uninsured deposits such as SVB and First Republic found themselves at risk because customers feared losing their savings on a bank run.

First Republic shares are down 97% so far this year as of Friday’s close.

The depletion of deposits has forced First Republic to borrow heavily from Federal Reserve facilities to maintain operations, squeezing the company’s margins because the cost of funding is much higher now. First Republic accounted for 72% of all borrowing from the Fed’s discount window recently, according to BCA Research’s chief strategist Doug Beta.

On April 24, First Republic CEO Michael Roeffler sought to portray a picture of stability after the events of March. He said deposit outflows had slowed in recent weeks. But the stock fell after the company disavowed previous financial guidance and Roffler chose not to respond to questions after an unusually short conference call.

The bank’s advisers hoped to persuade the largest US banks to come to the aid of the First Republic again. One version of the plan circulated recently involved requiring banks to pay above-market rates for bonds on First Republic’s balance sheet, which would enable them to raise capital from other sources.

But in the end, the banks, which banded together in March to inject $30 billion in deposits into the First Republic, couldn’t agree on the bailout and regulators took action, ending the bank’s 38-year tenure.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *