The England national team played two matches in the European Championship, winning one and drawing one, with 4 points, and the chances of qualifying for the second round are not difficult.
Although the work came out that way. But the criticism after the match was divided into two very different sides. To the point of wondering whether they are watching the same match or not.
One aspect, which is more collecting insults without holding back, tells me that the player is that good. Why don't we play this way? The coach is bad. Playing like that will never lead to a championship.
One team, and it's not many, says England are playing for the championship. It's not for beauty no matter what you do, it's enough for the team to win the championship. There are no UEFA rules or football rules anywhere that state this. The champion team must play well, and play beautifully.
On the contrary, it is the championship team that plays the ugliest football. The team that plays is worth watching. Won the championship too, in fact, there are only a few teams. And the team that played beautifully is often not successful.
The second match is against Denmark Gareth Southgate Arrange the first 11 people as usual. Although he was criticized Trent Alexander Arnold It's still a start, although the first game did not reach the goal.
I don't know if it's because of Southgate's stubbornness or if he actually planned the game that way, but in this game it's Liverpool's full-back who has to be moved to stand in as a central midfielder. You are still doing an unsatisfactory job.
Especially when the results of the competition are not the team can only draw the more holes available to mix and match.
Let's get real. Gareth Southgate's England team was not a team used to playing entertaining football. Or beautiful as many people understand it
He never cared about the game. He just wanted to win. He will do everything in his power to win for the team. Although it's not pretty
I'm not saying it's true, but it is. “strategy” And it still works. Because the reason he's still alive today is because of his performance, if he didn't have that performance, Southgate would have been gone a long time ago.
Many people ask where to work? He reached the Euro finals and the World Cup semi-finals. This is work.
Who says it's not work just ask in one word. Do you really hope England win every tournament?
Or is this called work? Are other teams not good at it? Don't other countries want to win the tournament? Don't you know how difficult it is to be a champion in every event?
He took the team to the major tournaments three times and did it well, and Southgate is considered better than any famous English coach of the past.
He hasn't won the championship yet. But there is still a chance. It's called Still on the Road.
The path chosen by Southgate is defensive play that emphasizes certainty. Take the results of the competition without caring about the format.
You might say, with such a good character, why don't they start attacking? You can change your style here.
So let me ask again: When the way you did it makes you successful. So why would you change it if it were you, would you change it?
Each team has its own approach. Can't compare. It may be true or false, no one knows when the event will end. Only work will tell.
I'm not saying that Southgate is right or that he likes Southgate, I'm just saying. Everything has a process.
All you have to do is choose the process that you think is best. Trust this process with all your heart. Follow the process as best you can. The rest is a matter of the future.
What the result will be, whether right or wrong, no one can say. Everything will be decided only in the end.
If the process is correct he goes on to become a champion or go to deep rounds
But if it's wrong, of course they have to go and let someone else start the process over.
For England, it's the manager's process and the type of players he has. They are different from each other.
So we saw the embarrassment. He didn't look as relaxed and comfortable as if he was playing for a club. This is because each attacker must be asked to play a role in the defensive game.
Bukayo Saka, Phil Foden, Jude Bellingham and even Harry Kane have been asked to come in and help out the defence. So it caused discomfort. He is anxious and does not play normally as he does in the club
This is a big problem for Southgate to solve. If this kind of theft continued, it would certainly not end well.
Earlier in his operation it was successful because he had elements that aligned with each other. There are good key players in the defensive game. Harry Maguire and Calvin Phillips
But this time, he didn't have both. The players on the team whose qualifications did not match his description all seemed very confusing.
The solution is to use it for attackers to continue playing defense.
Or remove some attackers and bring in natural defenders.
Ready to give the remaining forwards a chance to play their full attacking game. You don't have to worry about the defensive game.
It is true that a good manager is committed to his or her beliefs and processes. But the best manager must be able to adapt to the situation. And suitability as well
Because not every time. It will go according to plan
Will Southgate change? How will this change indicate whether England will reach the tournament or not?
“Typical food guru. Problem solver. Devoted beer practitioner. Professional reader. Baconaholic.”