Opening the order of the National Parks Department, “Chaiwat” is about to enter the case again.



News reports today (March 2) that the National Parks Department is opening Order 45/2023 to Chaiwat to pay compensation for damages with 3.6 million plus interest at 5 percent per annum while implementing a reforestation project to reduce flooding and global warming problems in the Kaeng Krachan Forest. The disputed land in Khao Yai, ALRO issued a statement asserting that it is the legal owner of the land.

Behind the Parks Department, the wild animals and plants authorities have finished considering the facts and responsibility of the cruelty. Order 45/2023 of the National Parks Department, Mr. Saiwat appears to be Limlikit Aksorn National Parks Office Director National Parks Department of Wildlife and Flora announced through the media After the heated issue, the removal of stock S.B.K. 4-01 Khao Yai National Park encroached forests.
This is from the fact-finding inquiry report of the committee ordered by the office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Wealth. Mr. Saiwat was the opinion when he was an expert in forestry studies. 23 August 2012 and no. 0937/2013 dated SECURITY AREA ADMINISTRATION NO. 3 (Ban Bong) no. 2308/2012 and no. Dated 23 April 2013, the survey was carried out. Rent installments 1-3 Promoter of afforestation scheme and determine details and average price. The details are given in the functional area of ​​4 plots totaling 4,200 rai in the national park area.
Whether the conditions of forest plantation land are suitable or not Mr. He knows how to lean. But he insists on defining a new area. Most of the area is forested in perfect condition. Only a small area is encroached upon by forests or is in a degraded state.

3 Recorded forest condition before planting and after planting from satellite data. Data analyzing the area of ​​forest plantations within specific boundaries have the same dimensions of each plot as the area designated for planting. From studying and interpreting the results, it was found that the condition of most of the areas, more than 81-85 percent of the planted area is in complete forest condition, not suitable for designation as forest plantation land and conducting periodic employment survey. 1-3 Mr. Saivad himself seems to have examined the work. But he along with three team members including Mr. Kamol did not go to inspect the afforestation work. Aunchai and Miss Suborn Fonban anyway.

Therefore, under the provisions of Section 12 of the Criminal Liability of Officers Act, P.E. 2539 Therefore, there was an order for Mr Saiwat to be liable to pay compensation amounting to 3,633,167 baht, plus interest at 5 per cent per annum from the date of default in payment. till payment of arrears to the Parks and Wildlife Department within 15 days from the date of notification of the said order.

On the same day (March 2), the public relations officer of the Agricultural Land Reform Office (Agricultural Land Reform Office) released a statement, indicating that there appears to be a dispute between the Agricultural Land Reform Office's land reform boundary line in Nakhon Ratchasima Province and the Khao Yai National Park boundary line. ALRO performs its duties under the National Parks Department, Animal Forests and Authorities to remove the flora species evidence markers under the Agricultural Land Reforms Act. Village No. 10, Ban Hiew Pla Kong, Moo Si Sub-District, Pak Chong District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, which has caused a dispute between government agencies.

Section 26 (3) and Section 36 bis of the Agricultural Land Reforms Act. 1975 and according to the Government Order delimiting the land boundaries, ALRO confirmed that the land in the disputed area is ALRO's land for use in agricultural land reform. In Sikyo District, Chung Noen District and Pak Chong District, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, they were designated as land reform areas in 1991. The Royal Thai Land Survey Department examined the field book data, which records the survey. National Park Service boundaries as per cartographic standards and international surveys have confirmed that the disputed area is in no way within National Park boundaries.

The Cabinet has a policy to update the State Land Boundary Map as per the One Map Scheme so that the land acquired by ALRO in the disputed area falls within the National Park boundaries. Concerned agencies should continue to promote legislation at the legislative level.
Pursuant to the Cabinet Resolution dated November 22, 2022, help provide compensation to bona fide farmers who have lost their rights under the Agricultural Land Reforms Act. As per the proposal of the National Land Policy Committee, the task of updating the State Land Boundary Map, 10 points.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *